2025, Vol. 12, Issue 4, Part D
A comparative study on the effects of different recovery strategies on delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), metabolic markers, and performance outcomes in trained athletes using physiological testing protocols
Author(s): Surabhi Namdev and Archana Nimoda
Abstract:Recovery is a vital component of athletic training and performance, especially in high-performance environments where repeated bouts of intense physical exertion can result in physiological disturbances such as Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS), increased metabolic stress, and decreased physical output. This study investigated and compared the efficacy of three recovery strategies: cold-water immersion (CWI), active recovery (AR), and passive rest (Control), focusing on their effects on DOMS, selected metabolic markers (blood lactate and serum creatine kinase), and aerobic performance outcomes (VO₂ max) in trained athletes. Forty-five male athletes aged 18-25 years were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15 each) and underwent a standardized eccentric exercise protocol to induce muscle soreness. Physiological testing protocols were employed pre-intervention and 48 hours post-intervention to assess recovery outcomes. Results revealed that CWI significantly reduced DOMS, facilitated the clearance of blood lactate, lowered serum CK levels, and helped preserve VO₂ max when compared to AR and control groups. The findings highlight the physiological advantages of cold-water immersion as a recovery modality. This study contributes to evidence-based practice for coaches, trainers, and sports scientists aiming to optimize athletic recovery and performance continuity.
DOI: 10.22271/kheljournal.2025.v12.i4d.3895Pages: 199-204 | 2097 Views 1859 DownloadsDownload Full Article: Click Here
How to cite this article:
Surabhi Namdev, Archana Nimoda.
A comparative study on the effects of different recovery strategies on delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), metabolic markers, and performance outcomes in trained athletes using physiological testing protocols. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health 2025;12(4):199-204. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2025.v12.i4d.3895