2024, Vol. 11, Issue 2, Part D
Construction of physical fitness norms for the students of athletics background
Author(s): Dr. Baljinder Singh Bal and Shilpa Sharma
Abstract:Study Aim: The aim of the study was to construct physical fitness percentile norms and distribution of grades for the students of athletics background.
Material and Methods: Forty-five (N=45) male subjects, ages 18 to 25, from the Department of Physical Education at Guru Nanak Dev University in Amritsar, Punjab, India, participated in the observational research study. The subsequent physical fitness variables were measured viz., Strength and Power Abilities (viz., Muscular Strength & Muscular Power), Endurance Abilities (viz., Muscular Endurance), Basic Movement Patterns (viz., Running Speed, Running Agility, Jumping Ability & Throwing Ability), Neuromuscular Abilities (Flexibility & Balance).
Statistical Analysis: The normality of the data was checked by using the Shapiro-Wilk (SW) Test of Normality. Under the data analysis, exploration of data was made with descriptive statistics and graphical analysis. Distribution of Grades under Normal Distribution was used, further it was sorted into five grades i.e., Excellent, Good, Average, Poor & Very Poor Descriptive and percentile statistics calculator was used for data analysis.
Results: In Muscular Strength: - Rating below 4.366 was very poor, 4.366 -14.625was poor, 14.625- 35.143 was average, 35.143-456.402 was good whereas, rating above 45.402 was excellent. In Muscular Power: - The rating below 29.453 was very poor, 29.453 -32.382 was poor, 32.382-38.24 was average, 38.24-41.169 was good whereas, Rating above 41.169 was excellent. In Muscular Endurance: - The rating below 1.43 was very poor, 1.43-2.826 was poor, 2.826-5.618 was average, 5.618-7.014 was good whereas, Rating above 7.014 was excellent. In Running Speed: - The rating above 4.252 was very poor, 4.252-4.164 was poor, 4.164-3.988 was average, 3.988-3.9 was good whereas, Rating below 3.9 was excellent. In Running Agility: - The rating above 22.376 was very poor, 22.376 -21.738 was poor, 21.738-20.462 was average, 20.462-19.824 was good whereas, Rating below 19.824 was excellent. In Jumping Ability: - The rating below 1.616 was very poor, 1.616-1.762 was poor, 1.762-2.054 was average, 2.054-2.22 was good whereas, Rating above 2.2 was excellent. In Throwing Ability: - The rating below 1.956 was very poor, 1.956-2.989 was poor, 2.989-5.055 was average, 5.055-6.088 was good whereas, Rating above 6.088 was excellent. In Flexibility: - The rating below 12.957 was very poor, 12.957-14.956 was poor, 14.956-18.954 was average, 18.954-20.953 was good whereas, Rating above 20.953 was excellent. In Balance: - The rating below 11.748 was very poor, 11.748-13.574 was poor, 13.574-17.226 was average, 17.226-19.052 was good whereas, Rating above 19.052 was excellent. In Muscular Strength: -The 10th percentile is 13.5 and 90th percentile is 41.72. In Muscular Power: -The 10th percentile is 31 and 90th percentile is 40. In Muscular Endurance: -The 10th percentile is 2 and 90th percentile is 6. In Running Speed: -The 10th percentile is 3.96 and 90th percentile is 4.19. In Running Agility: The 10th percentile is 20.13 and 90th percentile is 21.85. In Jumping Ability: The 10th percentile is 1.684 and 90th percentile is 2.096. In Throwing Ability: The 10th percentile is 3 and 90th percentile is 5.6. In Flexibility: The 10th percentile is 14 and 90th percentile is 20 and In Balance: The 10th percentile is 13 and 90th percentile is 18.
Pages: 243-248 | 248 Views 181 DownloadsDownload Full Article: Click Here
How to cite this article:
Dr. Baljinder Singh Bal, Shilpa Sharma. Construction of physical fitness norms for the students of athletics background. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health 2024;11(2):243-248.